[PATCH] RFC: Add XF86XK_Suspend and XF86XK_Hibernate keysym defs.
Peter Hutterer
peter.hutterer at who-t.net
Tue Nov 18 02:30:04 PST 2008
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:03:57AM +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 16:36 +1030, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > At the moment, we have the following keysyms defined to put a computer into a
> > sleep state:
> >
> > XF86XK_Standby 0x1008FF10 /* System into standby mode */
> > XF86XK_PowerDown 0x1008FF21 /* Deep sleep the system */
> > XF86XK_Sleep 0x1008FF2F /* Put system to sleep */
> >
> > Proposed change by Richard Hughes:
> > "The nomenclature I've been trying to make stick
> > (most projects now use this) for a few years now is:
> >
> > standby: high sleep state, nobody uses this any more
> > hibernate: sleep to disk - slow, but can remove power
> > suspend: sleep to ram - fast, but can't remove power
> > hybrid sleep: sleep to both, slow, and can remove power, but quick to
> > resume if you don't - most users don't use this"
> >
> > This patch adds XF86XK_Suspend and XF86XK_Hibernate. The behaviour of
> > XF86XK_Sleep can then be configured on a per-session basis.
[...]
>
> If there are no objections, could this patch please be merged? If the
> patch is pushed, then we can de-insane some of the XOrg->session
> mappings and then the only crazy thing left to patch is the kernel.
already pushed.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/x11proto/commit/?id=1e33337d4dd151da4f0898a86608a1ee67588163
I'll put that and the matching libX11 patch into Fedora tomorrow.
Cheers,
Peter
More information about the xorg
mailing list