[Clipart] Openclipart - striptease girl

[chovynz]

Ok, I've found another problem.
Anonymous users (as in not logged in) can see all nsfw, and logged in 
users cannot.
That's at the very least the opposite way around to what it needs to be.
You'll need to correct this Bassel since no-one else can yet, unless 
this is weirdly intentional? No use marking them as nsfw if "not logged 
in" can see them.

Cheers
Chovynz


On 14/07/2010 9:45 p.m., Donna Benjamin wrote:
> I don't think they should be censored in anyway - I think we should just
> flag the fact they are 'adult' content.
>
> It is a very fine line indeed. If it was a doll, with clothing options
> for dressing and undressing, there would be no problem. But these
> particular images are of women in sexualised poses. Many workplaces have
> very strict policies and most education jurisdictions would object to
> this material for young children.
>
> As I said I have no problem with the images, flagging them 'not safe for
> work (NSFW)' is a perfect solution.  The content remains, unchanged, but
> we're not promoting it on the front page - which could cause openclipart
> to be banned in schools - which would be a huge shame, as most of the
> content is perfectly suitable, and very useful in the classroom.
>
> Yes - I'd be happy to act as Librarian - and tag material I see, or that
> was flagged for review by others.
>
> cheers
> Donna
>
>
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:23 +1200, chovynz wrote:
>    
>> Should we consider removing the words and changing the descriptions on
>> cliparts like this? or we leave the words as is and if the uploader uses
>> words such as these that's when we nsfw them?
>> (I prefer the second option from a Librarian POV, and the first sounds
>> like censorship to me.)
>>
>>
>> On 14/07/2010 6:19 p.m., jon at rejon.org wrote:
>>      
>>> I think we should be more conservative on the main page, and yes,
>>> striptease and that they are easily undressable.
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:09 PM, chovynz<chovynz at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> I'm aware of the clipart, I don't necessarily agree with the decision to
>>>> hide them. Was it due to the title and wording only or the fact that they
>>>> can be undressed?
>>>> What's the way forward with these types of cliparts? Where's the line? Is it
>>>> if the title or tags says such things, or is it any clipart that can be
>>>> "undressed" irrespective of words?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Chovynz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 14/07/2010 12:08 p.m., Jon Phillips wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> actually, that functionality already is in place. I made the clipart
>>>>> NSFW and they vanished :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Donna, you want to help us patrol our clipart? We can make you a librarian
>>>>> :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Jon Phillips<jon at rejon.org>     wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>> totally, we have this in mind. Bassel, can we make sure that the NSFW
>>>>>> tagged content is not allowed on the main popular images section.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree, we should make sure our front page is good for all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Donna Benjamin<donna at kattekrab.net>
>>>>>>    wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>>>> Hey jon,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was using openclipart with some teachers in the past few weeks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are currently three clips in the popular downloads this month
>>>>>>> section
>>>>>>> on the front page that could be seen as inapropriate for school
>>>>>>> children.
>>>>>>> This could result in openclipart being blocked by school networks.  That
>>>>>>> would suck.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've got no problem with the images themselves, but wonder if we should
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> thinking about some kind of rating or tagging system that means they
>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>> be filtered out?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Images in question
>>>>>>> Striptease girl (you can undress me!) by rones
>>>>>>> Cheerleader (you can undress me!) by rones
>>>>>>> Asian girl cosplay by shokunin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> - Donna
>>>>>>>