[Clipart] Openclipart - striptease girl

[chovynz]

Fair enough. Reasonably well argued.
They are "intended" for adults, as indicated by the words.

Are you on the Mailing list? Subscription page 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/clipart> if you want it.
And what is your OCAL username? I'd like to see if I can give you 
Librarian status.

Cheers
Chovynz

On 14/07/2010 9:45 p.m., Donna Benjamin wrote:
> I don't think they should be censored in anyway - I think we should just
> flag the fact they are 'adult' content.
>
> It is a very fine line indeed. If it was a doll, with clothing options
> for dressing and undressing, there would be no problem. But these
> particular images are of women in sexualised poses. Many workplaces have
> very strict policies and most education jurisdictions would object to
> this material for young children.
>
> As I said I have no problem with the images, flagging them 'not safe for
> work (NSFW)' is a perfect solution.  The content remains, unchanged, but
> we're not promoting it on the front page - which could cause openclipart
> to be banned in schools - which would be a huge shame, as most of the
> content is perfectly suitable, and very useful in the classroom.
>
> Yes - I'd be happy to act as Librarian - and tag material I see, or that
> was flagged for review by others.
>
> cheers
> Donna
>
>
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:23 +1200, chovynz wrote:
>    
>> Should we consider removing the words and changing the descriptions on
>> cliparts like this? or we leave the words as is and if the uploader uses
>> words such as these that's when we nsfw them?
>> (I prefer the second option from a Librarian POV, and the first sounds
>> like censorship to me.)
>>
>>
>> On 14/07/2010 6:19 p.m., jon at rejon.org wrote:
>>      
>>> I think we should be more conservative on the main page, and yes,
>>> striptease and that they are easily undressable.
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:09 PM, chovynz<chovynz at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> I'm aware of the clipart, I don't necessarily agree with the decision to
>>>> hide them. Was it due to the title and wording only or the fact that they
>>>> can be undressed?
>>>> What's the way forward with these types of cliparts? Where's the line? Is it
>>>> if the title or tags says such things, or is it any clipart that can be
>>>> "undressed" irrespective of words?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Chovynz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 14/07/2010 12:08 p.m., Jon Phillips wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> actually, that functionality already is in place. I made the clipart
>>>>> NSFW and they vanished :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Donna, you want to help us patrol our clipart? We can make you a librarian
>>>>> :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Jon Phillips<jon at rejon.org>     wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>> totally, we have this in mind. Bassel, can we make sure that the NSFW
>>>>>> tagged content is not allowed on the main popular images section.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree, we should make sure our front page is good for all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Donna Benjamin<donna at kattekrab.net>
>>>>>>    wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>>>> Hey jon,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was using openclipart with some teachers in the past few weeks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are currently three clips in the popular downloads this month
>>>>>>> section
>>>>>>> on the front page that could be seen as inapropriate for school
>>>>>>> children.
>>>>>>> This could result in openclipart being blocked by school networks.  That
>>>>>>> would suck.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've got no problem with the images themselves, but wonder if we should
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> thinking about some kind of rating or tagging system that means they
>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>> be filtered out?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Images in question
>>>>>>> Striptease girl (you can undress me!) by rones
>>>>>>> Cheerleader (you can undress me!) by rones
>>>>>>> Asian girl cosplay by shokunin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> - Donna
>>>>>>>                

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/clipart/attachments/20100714/9886fee8/attachment.html>