[Clipart] Openclipart - striptease girl

[Bassel Safadi]

Yes you are right!
that clipart was not tagged as NSFW, now it's tagged by Jon and no
more appear on the front page

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Donna Benjamin <donna at kattekrab.net> wrote:

> Ha!  Yes - that does seem the wrong way round.
>
> I think the filter should just apply to the front page though.  Anon users
> should be able tobaee nsfw if theybwantnto, we just shouldn't promote to
> front page.
>
> What do others think?
>
>
> Cheers
> - Donna
>
> ... On the road. Sent from my phone.
>
> On 14/07/2010, at 8:23 PM, chovynz <chovynz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Ok, I've found another problem.
>> Anonymous users (as in not logged in) can see all nsfw, and logged in
>> users cannot.
>> That's at the very least the opposite way around to what it needs to be.
>> You'll need to correct this Bassel since no-one else can yet, unless this
>> is weirdly intentional? No use marking them as nsfw if "not logged in" can
>> see them.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Chovynz
>>
>>
>> On 14/07/2010 9:45 p.m., Donna Benjamin wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think they should be censored in anyway - I think we should just
>>> flag the fact they are 'adult' content.
>>>
>>> It is a very fine line indeed. If it was a doll, with clothing options
>>> for dressing and undressing, there would be no problem. But these
>>> particular images are of women in sexualised poses. Many workplaces have
>>> very strict policies and most education jurisdictions would object to
>>> this material for young children.
>>>
>>> As I said I have no problem with the images, flagging them 'not safe for
>>> work (NSFW)' is a perfect solution.  The content remains, unchanged, but
>>> we're not promoting it on the front page - which could cause openclipart
>>> to be banned in schools - which would be a huge shame, as most of the
>>> content is perfectly suitable, and very useful in the classroom.
>>>
>>> Yes - I'd be happy to act as Librarian - and tag material I see, or that
>>> was flagged for review by others.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> Donna
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:23 +1200, chovynz wrote:
>>>
>>>  Should we consider removing the words and changing the descriptions on
>>>> cliparts like this? or we leave the words as is and if the uploader uses
>>>> words such as these that's when we nsfw them?
>>>> (I prefer the second option from a Librarian POV, and the first sounds
>>>> like censorship to me.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 14/07/2010 6:19 p.m., jon at rejon.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  I think we should be more conservative on the main page, and yes,
>>>>> striptease and that they are easily undressable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:09 PM, chovynz<chovynz at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  I'm aware of the clipart, I don't necessarily agree with the decision
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> hide them. Was it due to the title and wording only or the fact that
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> can be undressed?
>>>>>> What's the way forward with these types of cliparts? Where's the line?
>>>>>> Is it
>>>>>> if the title or tags says such things, or is it any clipart that can
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> "undressed" irrespective of words?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Chovynz
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14/07/2010 12:08 p.m., Jon Phillips wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  actually, that functionality already is in place. I made the clipart
>>>>>>> NSFW and they vanished :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Donna, you want to help us patrol our clipart? We can make you a
>>>>>>> librarian
>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Jon Phillips<jon at rejon.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  totally, we have this in mind. Bassel, can we make sure that the
>>>>>>>> NSFW
>>>>>>>> tagged content is not allowed on the main popular images section.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I agree, we should make sure our front page is good for all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Donna Benjamin<donna at kattekrab.net
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Hey jon,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was using openclipart with some teachers in the past few weeks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There are currently three clips in the popular downloads this month
>>>>>>>>> section
>>>>>>>>> on the front page that could be seen as inapropriate for school
>>>>>>>>> children.
>>>>>>>>> This could result in openclipart being blocked by school networks.
>>>>>>>>>  That
>>>>>>>>> would suck.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've got no problem with the images themselves, but wonder if we
>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> thinking about some kind of rating or tagging system that means
>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>> be filtered out?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Images in question
>>>>>>>>> Striptease girl (you can undress me!) by rones
>>>>>>>>> Cheerleader (you can undress me!) by rones
>>>>>>>>> Asian girl cosplay by shokunin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>> - Donna
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>


-- 
Bassel Safadi
http://bassel.ws
http://aikiframework.org
Global +1 323-545-3855
Singapore +65 93488349
Syria +963 988-476040
Lebanon +961 70570741
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/clipart/attachments/20100714/ad9eb886/attachment.html>