Command line changes for TM branch
Keith Packard
keithp at keithp.com
Tue Mar 30 08:57:00 PST 2004
Around 14 o'clock on Mar 30, Egbert Eich wrote:
> I wonder why we need this -x??<foo> anyway. Whouldn't -<foo> be
> sufficient (unless there is a conflict with an existing option).
> I mean, why -xf86config or -xorgconfig instead of just -config
> for example?
Yes, the server should (and does, I believe) accept '-config'. I was
extrapolating from the gtf program which I had just fixed and which can
output mode lines for either fbdev or X and accepts:
-f, --fbmode output fbdev-style mode information
-x, --xorgmode, --xf86mode output XFree86-style mode information
In cases where '-xf86<foo>' can be safely converted to '-foo', we should
certainly do that as well as accepting -xf86<foo> and perhaps -xorg<foo> as
synonyms.
I can go back through the changes I made and check for other command line
argument changes to see if I did something screwy...
-keith
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://freedesktop.org/pipermail/release-wranglers/attachments/20040330/15603279/attachment.pgp
More information about the release-wranglers
mailing list