Are we doing 6.8.3 or not?

[Daniel Stone]

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 12:15:06PM -0400, Kevin E Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:40:27AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > I keep seeing more and more bugs nominated for 6.8.3, but no
> > one doing anything with them.   Are we doing this or not?  If
> > so, we need a release manager to step up now and get things
> > moving, otherwise it won't be done until after 6.9/7.0.
> 
> I completely agree, and I think 6.8.3 needs to happen.  In addition to
> 6.8.3, we also have 6.9/7.0 on the near horizon.  Here is a strawman
> proposal for moving forward with each of these releases:
> 
> People that have time and are interested in being the release manager
> for the 6.8.3 release should speak up now.  If we have someone that has
> the time to make it happen, then we should go ahead with the release.
> Several people put their names in the hat in the past, but I don't know
> if they still have the time.
> 
> I would like to be the overall release manager for the combined 6.9/7.0
> release.  Two others have discussed being release managers as well: Alan
> Coopersmith and Adam Jackson.  Due to the size of the 6.9/7.0 release, I
> think it would be good to spread the load among several people.  If they
> are still interested, then I think we could divide the work up such that
> I would handle the overall release, Alan would be in charge of 6.9 part
> and Adam would be in charge of 7.0.
> 
> What do you all think about this strawman proposal?

Sounds good to me.  It's been mentioned before and no-one's objected, so
let's just take this and start moving with it as quickly as possible.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/release-wranglers/attachments/20050426/644b16fc/attachment.pgp