[Telepathy] Change proposal to Connection.Interface.Capabilities

Olli Salli ollisal at gmail.com
Tue Sep 19 07:48:29 PDT 2006


Hi,

I'm afraid I don't see much benefit in the change. It just makes the signals
harder to construct and iterate. However, some clarification to the spec
could be added regarding the issue, if it's misleading.

Br,
Olli Salli

On 9/18/06, Daniel d'Andrada Tenório de Carvalho <
daniel.carvalho at indt.org.br> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The some method signatures of the current
> Connection.Interface.Capabilities are looking somewhat crude.
>
> They currently use a tuple (contact_handle, channel_type,
> type_generic_flags, type_specific_flags).
>
> I'm proposing using (contact_handle, array(channel_type,
> type_generic_flags, type_specific_flags))
> since each handle may advertise several channel types.
>
> The current specification "just works", of course, but its simplistic
> approach can be an issue (e.g. misleading).
>
> Attached to this e-mail is a patch to solve that.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel d'Andrada T. de Carvalho - INdT
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Telepathy mailing list
> Telepathy at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/telepathy
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/telepathy/attachments/20060919/35059084/attachment.htm


More information about the Telepathy mailing list