[PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/powerplay: avoid double check feature enabled

Wang, Kevin(Yang) Kevin1.Wang at amd.com
Fri Jul 12 07:21:17 UTC 2019


thanks,
i will make a new patch to fix this problem.

Best Regards,
Kevin
________________________________
From: Quan, Evan
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 3:09:54 PM
To: Wang, Kevin(Yang); amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Feng, Kenneth
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/powerplay: avoid double check feature enabled

Patch1 & 2 are reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan at amd.com>

For patch3, for dpm disabled case, "smu_get_dpm_freq_range(smu, clk_type, &min_freq,&max_freq)" will not se the min_freq and max_freq.
That will cause some troubles for the succeeding smu_set_soft_freq_range. Please get that handled properly.

Regards,
Evan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Kevin(Yang) <Kevin1.Wang at amd.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 3:00 PM
> To: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Feng, Kenneth <Kenneth.Feng at amd.com>; Quan, Evan
> <Evan.Quan at amd.com>; Wang, Kevin(Yang) <Kevin1.Wang at amd.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/powerplay: avoid double check feature
> enabled
>
> the unforce_dpm_levels doesn't need to check feature enable, because the
> smu_get_dpm_freq_range function has check feature logic.
>
> Change-Id: I6ae62b355aa76a00f0f6e164cd9848fb32fc7c12
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang at amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/navi10_ppt.c | 23 ++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/navi10_ppt.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/navi10_ppt.c
> index 16a4c1ca98cf..895a4e592d5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/navi10_ppt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/navi10_ppt.c
> @@ -833,27 +833,20 @@ static int navi10_force_dpm_limit_value(struct
> smu_context *smu, bool highest)
>        return ret;
>  }
>
> -static int navi10_unforce_dpm_levels(struct smu_context *smu) {
> -
> +static int navi10_unforce_dpm_levels(struct smu_context *smu) {
>        int ret = 0, i = 0;
>        uint32_t min_freq, max_freq;
>        enum smu_clk_type clk_type;
>
> -     struct clk_feature_map {
> -             enum smu_clk_type clk_type;
> -             uint32_t        feature;
> -     } clk_feature_map[] = {
> -             {SMU_GFXCLK, SMU_FEATURE_DPM_GFXCLK_BIT},
> -             {SMU_MCLK,   SMU_FEATURE_DPM_UCLK_BIT},
> -             {SMU_SOCCLK, SMU_FEATURE_DPM_SOCCLK_BIT},
> +     enum smu_clk_type clks[] = {
> +             SMU_GFXCLK,
> +             SMU_MCLK,
> +             SMU_SOCCLK,
>        };
>
> -     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(clk_feature_map); i++) {
> -             if (!smu_feature_is_enabled(smu,
> clk_feature_map[i].feature))
> -                 continue;
> -
> -             clk_type = clk_feature_map[i].clk_type;
> -
> +     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(clks); i++) {
> +             clk_type = clks[i];
>                ret = smu_get_dpm_freq_range(smu, clk_type, &min_freq,
> &max_freq);
>                if (ret)
>                        return ret;
> --
> 2.22.0

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20190712/f17e22df/attachment.html>


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list