crash in dbus-launch

Havoc Pennington hp at
Mon Nov 13 12:32:18 PST 2006

John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> No it is not.  The patch applies cleanly to 1.0.0.  This should be
> committed to HEAD and a branch created for 1.0.1 and applied there.
> What is the procedure for branching point releases?  Do we branch on
> 1.0.0 and tag 1.0.1 when we do a release or do we just make a 1.0.1
> branch and then freeze it when we make a release?

README talks about it a bit. There should be two branches, 1.0.x and 
HEAD. The 1.0.x branch should have a tag for all 1.0.x releases after 
the branchpoint. Prior to the branchpoint, there can be tags for either 
1.0.x or 1.1.x as long as the two were the same codebase. The 
branchpoint itself should be tagged, since that allows computing the 
diff since the branch.

IOW just like all the gtk/gnome modules.

As soon as you branch lots of stuff will have to be committed twice 
though, so we might want to do a 1.0.1, 1.0.2 first, if none of the 
destabilizing changes urgently need to go in.


More information about the dbus mailing list