1.4.1, 1.5.0, 1.6

[Pavel Strashkin]

Looks good, but there is no any word about Solaris. Why? There is a
lot (or few) of issues under Solaris, some of them already have the
patches, but nobody want to check it. I would like to improve DBus for
Solaris platforms, but i don't how. What i must to do? Especially when
all patches and discussions go in silence.

2011/1/25 Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie at collabora.co.uk>:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 at 13:34:58 +0000, Will Thompson wrote:
>> Looking at the changes on master since 1.4.0, we have a bunch of
>> miscellaneous fixes by Christian, some autolaunch-related changes
>> and miscellaneous bugfixes for Windows, and launchd integration and
>> miscellaneous fixes for OS X. Plus a bunch of additions and cleanup
>> to the documentation and its build system. So far I think this is
>> all kosher for a 1.4.1 release.
>
> Will released that. It should apparently have been called 1.4.2 because in
> D-Bus-land, the micro version also has odd/even semantics, but never mind.
>
> Other things currently on my radar for 1.4.x:
>
> * regression test/leak fixes (#33126, #33277)
>
> The master branch still looks good for 1.4.x to me. After the next release,
> I'd like to branch dbus-1.4 so we can merge the following to master:
>
> * Will's arg0namespace match rule stuff (#24317)
> * my mainloop refactoring (#33336, #33342)
> * Doxygen improvements (#13495)
> * library cross-linking reduction (#27287)
> * dbus-1-uninstalled.pc (#32827)
>
> and when they're ready:
>
> * mainloop fixes enabled by my refactoring (#23194)
> * epoll support on Linux
> * Christian's maybe type (#27857)?
> * GetConnectionMatchRules (#24307) and other debugging support?
>
> Regards,
>    S
> _______________________________________________
> dbus mailing list
> dbus at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus
>