0-size array marshaling ?

[Jean Parpaillon]

Hi,
Le lundi 18 juillet 2016 à 09:15 -0700, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> On segunda-feira, 18 de julho de 2016 11:08:37 PDT Jean Parpaillon
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the tip.
> > Answer is: always pad, even with 0-size array.
> > Test code in attachment.
> > I think I've fixed dbus-java code in
> > https://github.com/jeanparpaillon/
> > dbus-java
> > Would be glad to push into the right repository, but freedesktop
> > one
> > does not seem to be up-to-date (no 2.8 tag).
> 
> You created that tag two weeks ago. No wonder that it's not in the
> upstream 
> source. Why are you creating tags in a downstream repository?
I understand it seems weird :) 
According to Debian (https://packages.debian.org/sid/dbus-java-bin   ),
there is 2.8 upstream tag somewhere and upstream website always point
to freedesktop.
I may be wrong but I haven't seen any 2.8 tag on freedesktop git.
So I've cloned fdo git and applied the diffs between 2.7 (last tag on
fdo) and upstream 2.8 according to Debian.
I understand it's confusing and it could be really nice to ensure that
dbus-java on fdo is up-to-date.
Regards,
-- 
Jean Parpaillon
--
Open Source Consultant
Director @ OW2 Consortium
OCCIware Strategic Orientation Committee Chairman
Research Engineer @ Inria
--
Phone: +33 6 30 10 92 86
im: jean.parpaillon at gmail.com
skype: jean.parpaillon
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeanparpaillon/en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20160719/9a63101c/attachment.html>