Automated adoption of devkit-power latencies
hughsient at gmail.com
Wed Nov 12 03:30:06 PST 2008
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 18:41 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> Yep, absolutely agree. But even there wouldn't it be nice if e.g. during
> the day that server would have a 10us latency for CPU and during the
> night automatically transition to higher and higher latencies, up to
> even 100ms or so? Or a desktop system that has a screenlock running
> overnight, the user forgot to close his firefox window with a flash
> plugin running in it.
Sure, that's a great use case.
> And devices that take a lot longer to power down resp. up e.g. harddisks
> aren't addresses by the latency changes yet if i remember correctly?
I don't see why they can't be added, of course, at the moment there's no
momentum for this stuff in the kernel because nothing uses it in
More information about the devkit-devel