Preparing for a stable branch of flatpak

[Allan Day]

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 11/30/2016 05:07 PM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
>
>> The current names are quite long, but they are obviously unique. Using
>> something like ".app" is more likely to conflict with other apps or be
>> seen as too generic. What do people think about the short forms "*.fpa"
>> and "*.fpr" instead?
>>
>
> My spontaneous reaction is that .flatpakrepo and .flatpakref are just fine
> while .fpa and .fpr are "please don't".


Can you explain why?

Allan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/flatpak/attachments/20161130/18940398/attachment.html>