[Fontconfig] strict check for object modification

[Akira TAGOH]

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Raimund Steger <rs at mytum.de> wrote:
> For example, in environments where none of the 10-* config files are enabled
> by default, it is entirely possible that applications specify fonts like
>
>   sans:rgba=rgb
>
> for some uses and
>
>   sans:rgba=none
>
> for others.

Is it expected that the pattern in the kind of the strong binding
should be inherited to the result? or should the explicit patterns be
inherited if it's not the objects to be checked with the matcher?

>
> I think it would be irritating if patterns like these couldn't fully be
> edited in the configuration.
> Now it's true that such cases could still be sorted out after the match. It
> just seems a bit arbitrary to forbid such edits.
>
> Raimund
>
>
>
> --
> Worringer Str 31 Duesseldorf 40211 Germany +49-179-2981632 icq 16845346



-- 
Akira TAGOH