hal: Branch 'master'
Danny Kukawka
danny.kukawka at web.de
Mon Aug 27 10:33:04 PDT 2007
On Montag, 27. August 2007, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > IMO this change is at least suboptimal within RC status of HAL.
>
> It's not really optimal, I agree. But it should be a rather minimal
> change (either in hal or the kpowersave / powersaved) packages;
Not if you don't be able to force your users to use a recent HAL version.
KPowersave e.g. support: recommended: >= 0.5.8.1 and without this change it
would also work with 0.5.10 without changes. Now we have either to double the
calls to check both names of possible policies or to fill the code with
ifdef's
The big problem is that RC1 of HAL 0.5.10 (which already had a dependency to
the new released PK v0.4) is already out some weeks and this change would
obsolete all testing in this area.
> basically just a string change I believe? (Btw, I'm going to bump the
> soname of libpolkit.so too because of some other changes)
The soname doesn't IMO matter, should be no problem.
Danny
More information about the hal-commit
mailing list