[PATCH] lshal - The next generation

[Richard Hughes]

On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 17:59 +0100, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> If you want to keep the old behaviour of lshal you should also print
> for 
> 'lshal' the long version (maybe add a option --short or --udi). IMO
> the short 
> output of lshal isn't what you want if you run lshal without options.

I think I'm agreed on this. The long version is much more useful.

Richard.