Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

[Bastien Nocera]

On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 22:11 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 12:10 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Heya,
> > 
> > I got ahold of the latest hal, pm-utils, and kernel from Rawhide, and
> > after some testing, realised that the Latitude D420's suspend worked
> > out-of-the-box. Ie. "echo mem > /sys/power/state" suspended the
> > computer, and pressing the power button resumed it with video and all.
> > 
> > Should the D420 be whitelisted in hal-info to help out with possible
> > debugging?
> 
> Sounds like a good idea. Sufficient to just leave a comment in the file?
> Or did you want something more fancy like merging a property saying
> essentially saying no quirks are needed? 
> 
> (the latter is probably the right answer since it allows higher level
> software a'la gnome-device-manager to display just a smiley along with
> the message "suspend will work" (of course if suspend then doesn't work
> all more then reason to piss of the user)).

It doesn't mean that suspend will work, just that it doesn't need quirks
for it to work :)

Patches attached (it also fixes the duplicated D410 quirk I posted
about)

Cheers

-- 
Bastien Nocera <hadess at hadess.net> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hal-info-D420-no-quirk.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1019 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/attachments/20070502/f1266925/hal-info-D420-no-quirk.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hal-spec-no-quirks.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 775 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/attachments/20070502/f1266925/hal-spec-no-quirks.bin