[igt-dev] [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/sysfs_timeslice_duration: skip off subtest for GuC submission

[pallavi.mishra at intel.com]

From: Pallavi Mishra <pallavi.mishra at intel.com>

Don't run 'off' section as with GuC submission we don't handle
dynamically changing the timeslice duration from 'off' to 'on' on a
currently running context. This is not bug in GuC submission rather an
architectural decision to not implement this as there is no user aside
from IGTs.

Co-authored-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pallavi Mishra <pallavi.mishra at intel.com>
---
 tests/i915/sysfs_timeslice_duration.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/i915/sysfs_timeslice_duration.c b/tests/i915/sysfs_timeslice_duration.c
index c23424c6..92c4c5ea 100644
--- a/tests/i915/sysfs_timeslice_duration.c
+++ b/tests/i915/sysfs_timeslice_duration.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
 
+#include "igt.h"
 #include "igt_params.h"
 #include "drmtest.h"
 #include "i915/gem.h"
@@ -475,6 +476,13 @@ static void test_off(int i915, int engine)
 	gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
 	igt_require(enable_hangcheck(i915, false));
 
+	/* GuC does not handle dynamic change in timeslice
+	 * duration from 'off' to 'on' on a currently
+	 * running context. Hence add below check.
+	 */
+
+	igt_require(!gem_using_guc_submission(i915));
+
 	igt_assert(igt_sysfs_scanf(engine, "class", "%u", &class) == 1);
 	igt_assert(igt_sysfs_scanf(engine, "instance", "%u", &inst) == 1);
 
-- 
2.25.1