[PATCH i-g-t 2/2] "tests/intel/xe_gt_freq: Fix freq_low_max test
Nilawar, Badal
badal.nilawar at intel.com
Fri Jun 14 14:19:57 UTC 2024
On 14-06-2024 19:07, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Hi Badal,
> On 2024-06-14 at 15:37:12 +0530, Badal Nilawar wrote:
>> Intention of freq_low_max is to validate GuC PC flow when max freq set
>> to less than min freq. Validating cur freq is enough as workloads are
>> not being run.
>>
>> Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar at intel.com>
>
> Instead of revert and fixing revert, please send one patch
> and add there which one did you fixed.
Sure, will send one patch with fixed tag
>
>> ---
>> tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c b/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
>> index 24333612b..b3562181d 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
>> @@ -277,7 +277,6 @@ static void test_freq_low_max(int fd, int gt_id)
>> rpe = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rpe");
>>
>> igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "cur") == rpe);
>> - igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act") == rpe);
>
> Why ot writing comment here why "act" frequency is not checked?
Sure, will add comment.
Thanks,
Badal
>
> Regards,
> Kamil
>
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list