[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9] drm/i915/icl: Check for fused-off VDBOX and VEBOX instances
Sagar Arun Kamble
sagar.a.kamble at intel.com
Tue Feb 27 05:49:03 UTC 2018
On 2/27/2018 4:34 AM, Oscar Mateo wrote:
>
>
> On 2/25/2018 9:22 PM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/23/2018 4:35 AM, Oscar Mateo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> <snip>
>>>>> + * We might have detected that some engines are fused off after
>>>>> we initialized
>>>>> + * the forcewake domains. Prune them, to make sure they only
>>>>> reference existing
>>>>> + * engines.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +void intel_uncore_prune(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
>>>>> + enum forcewake_domains fw_domains =
>>>>> dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains;
>>>>> + enum forcewake_domain_id domain_id;
>>>>> + int i;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < I915_MAX_VCS; i++) {
>>>>> + domain_id = FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX0 + i;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (HAS_ENGINE(dev_priv, _VCS(i)))
>>>>> + continue;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (fw_domains & BIT(domain_id))
>>>> fw_domains check seems redundant as it is initialized based on
>>>> HAS_ENGINE.
>>>> we can just have
>>>> if (!HAS_ENGINE(dev_priv, _VCS(i)))
>>>> fw_domain_fini(dev_priv, domain_id);
>>>
>>> I don't want to call fw_domain_fini on something we never
>>> initialized in the first place (e.g. VCS1/3 and VECS1/2/3 on an
>>> ICL-LP).
>>>
>> Right. Makes sense.
>> for loop iterating over engines based on ring_mask can help us rely
>> on only HAS_ENGINE condition and then we can have complete pruning in
>> single for loop.
>> what do you think?
>
> Hmmm.. I'm not sure I follow: intel_device_info_init_mmio modifies
> ring_mask, so if I loop over engines based on ring_mask I am going to
> miss those I want to prune, right?
>
Oops ... you are right ...
My suggestion about skipping fw_domains check will not work currently.
In future may be if we create default ring_mask and runtime ring_mask it
can be reworked.
Other suggestion to use single for loop (for_each_engine()) can be done
I think.
It will make it generic for all engine types. Below is what I am
thinking of as part of intel_uncore_prune:
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(intel_engines); i++) {
if (HAS_ENGINE(dev_priv, i))
continue;
if (fw_domains & BIT(i))
fw_domain_fini(dev_priv, i);
}
>>>>> + fw_domain_fini(dev_priv, domain_id);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < I915_MAX_VECS; i++) {
>>>>> + domain_id = FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX0 + i;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (HAS_ENGINE(dev_priv, _VECS(i)))
>>>>> + continue;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (fw_domains & BIT(domain_id))
>>>>> + fw_domain_fini(dev_priv, domain_id);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> void intel_uncore_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>>>> {
>>>>> /* Paranoia: make sure we have disabled everything before we
>>>>> exit. */
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
>>>>> index 53ef77d..28feabf 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
>>>>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct intel_uncore {
>>>>> void intel_uncore_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>> void intel_uncore_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>> +void intel_uncore_prune(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>> bool intel_uncore_unclaimed_mmio(struct drm_i915_private
>>>>> *dev_priv);
>>>>> bool intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection(struct
>>>>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>> void intel_uncore_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Thanks,
Sagar
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list