[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9] drm/i915/icl: Check for fused-off VDBOX and VEBOX instances
Oscar Mateo
oscar.mateo at intel.com
Wed Feb 28 17:59:54 UTC 2018
On 2/26/2018 9:49 PM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
>
>
> On 2/27/2018 4:34 AM, Oscar Mateo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/25/2018 9:22 PM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/23/2018 4:35 AM, Oscar Mateo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>>>> + * We might have detected that some engines are fused off after
>>>>>> we initialized
>>>>>> + * the forcewake domains. Prune them, to make sure they only
>>>>>> reference existing
>>>>>> + * engines.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +void intel_uncore_prune(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
>>>>>> + enum forcewake_domains fw_domains =
>>>>>> dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains;
>>>>>> + enum forcewake_domain_id domain_id;
>>>>>> + int i;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < I915_MAX_VCS; i++) {
>>>>>> + domain_id = FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX0 + i;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (HAS_ENGINE(dev_priv, _VCS(i)))
>>>>>> + continue;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (fw_domains & BIT(domain_id))
>>>>> fw_domains check seems redundant as it is initialized based on
>>>>> HAS_ENGINE.
>>>>> we can just have
>>>>> if (!HAS_ENGINE(dev_priv, _VCS(i)))
>>>>> fw_domain_fini(dev_priv, domain_id);
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to call fw_domain_fini on something we never
>>>> initialized in the first place (e.g. VCS1/3 and VECS1/2/3 on an
>>>> ICL-LP).
>>>>
>>> Right. Makes sense.
>>> for loop iterating over engines based on ring_mask can help us rely
>>> on only HAS_ENGINE condition and then we can have complete pruning
>>> in single for loop.
>>> what do you think?
>>
>> Hmmm.. I'm not sure I follow: intel_device_info_init_mmio modifies
>> ring_mask, so if I loop over engines based on ring_mask I am going to
>> miss those I want to prune, right?
>>
> Oops ... you are right ...
> My suggestion about skipping fw_domains check will not work currently.
> In future may be if we create default ring_mask and runtime ring_mask
> it can be reworked.
>
> Other suggestion to use single for loop (for_each_engine()) can be
> done I think.
> It will make it generic for all engine types. Below is what I am
> thinking of as part of intel_uncore_prune:
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(intel_engines); i++) {
> if (HAS_ENGINE(dev_priv, i))
> continue;
> if (fw_domains & BIT(i))
> fw_domain_fini(dev_priv, i);
> }
This won't work either, because the index for engines and forcewake
domains is different. If you think it is important to make the prune
function more generic, I can translate between the two (but it will be
for naught if, as you mentioned, we are working to create separate
default ring_mask and runtime ring_mask in the future).
>>>>>> + fw_domain_fini(dev_priv, domain_id);
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < I915_MAX_VECS; i++) {
>>>>>> + domain_id = FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX0 + i;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (HAS_ENGINE(dev_priv, _VECS(i)))
>>>>>> + continue;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (fw_domains & BIT(domain_id))
>>>>>> + fw_domain_fini(dev_priv, domain_id);
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> void intel_uncore_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> /* Paranoia: make sure we have disabled everything before
>>>>>> we exit. */
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
>>>>>> index 53ef77d..28feabf 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
>>>>>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct intel_uncore {
>>>>>> void intel_uncore_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>>> void intel_uncore_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>>> +void intel_uncore_prune(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>>> bool intel_uncore_unclaimed_mmio(struct drm_i915_private
>>>>>> *dev_priv);
>>>>>> bool intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection(struct
>>>>>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>>> void intel_uncore_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list