[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/execlists: Pull submit after dequeue under timeline lock
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Jun 1 14:02:38 UTC 2018
On 31/05/2018 19:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
> In the next patch, we will begin processing the CSB from inside the
> interrupt handler. This means that updating the execlists->port[] will
The message that we will be processing CSB from irq handler, here and in
following patch 5/11, doesn't seem to be true. So why is this needed?
Why not just drop some patches from the series?
Regards,
Tvrtko
> no longer be locked by the tasklet but by the engine->timeline.lock
> instead. Pull dequeue and submit under the same lock for protection.
> (An alternative, future, plan is to keep the in/out arrays separate for
> concurrent processing and reduced lock coverage.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 32 ++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index e5cf049c18f8..d207a1bf9dc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static void complete_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
> execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
> }
>
> -static bool __execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +static void __execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
> struct execlist_port *port = execlists->port;
> @@ -617,11 +617,11 @@ static bool __execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> * the HW to indicate that it has had a chance to respond.
> */
> if (!execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK))
> - return false;
> + return;
>
> if (need_preempt(engine, last, execlists->queue_priority)) {
> inject_preempt_context(engine);
> - return false;
> + return;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ static bool __execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> * priorities of the ports haven't been switch.
> */
> if (port_count(&port[1]))
> - return false;
> + return;
>
> /*
> * WaIdleLiteRestore:bdw,skl
> @@ -746,8 +746,10 @@ static bool __execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> port != execlists->port ? rq_prio(last) : INT_MIN;
>
> execlists->first = rb;
> - if (submit)
> + if (submit) {
> port_assign(port, last);
> + execlists_submit_ports(engine);
> + }
>
> /* We must always keep the beast fed if we have work piled up */
> GEM_BUG_ON(execlists->first && !port_isset(execlists->port));
> @@ -756,24 +758,19 @@ static bool __execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> if (last)
> execlists_user_begin(execlists, execlists->port);
>
> - return submit;
> + /* If the engine is now idle, so should be the flag; and vice versa. */
> + GEM_BUG_ON(execlists_is_active(&engine->execlists,
> + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER) ==
> + !port_isset(engine->execlists.port));
> }
>
> static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> - struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
> unsigned long flags;
> - bool submit;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->timeline.lock, flags);
> - submit = __execlists_dequeue(engine);
> + __execlists_dequeue(engine);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->timeline.lock, flags);
> -
> - if (submit)
> - execlists_submit_ports(engine);
> -
> - GEM_BUG_ON(port_isset(execlists->port) &&
> - !execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER));
> }
>
> void
> @@ -1156,11 +1153,6 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
>
> if (!execlists_is_active(&engine->execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT))
> execlists_dequeue(engine);
> -
> - /* If the engine is now idle, so should be the flag; and vice versa. */
> - GEM_BUG_ON(execlists_is_active(&engine->execlists,
> - EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER) ==
> - !port_isset(engine->execlists.port));
> }
>
> static void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list