[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/psr: Update PSR2 resolution check for Cannonlake
Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com
Tue Mar 6 20:45:44 UTC 2018
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 22:38 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 12:33:55PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > In fact, apply the Cannonlake resolution check for all >= Gen-10 platforms
> > to be safe.
> >
> > v3: Update GLK too. (Ville)
> > Longer variable names.
> > if-else in place of ternary operator.
> > v2: Use local variables for resolution limits and print them (Ville)
> >
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > Cc: Elio Martinez Monroy <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > index 05770790a4e9..23175c5c4a50 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -451,8 +451,9 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > {
> > struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> > - const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> > - &crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode;
> > + int crtc_hdisplay = crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay;
> > + int crtc_vdisplay = crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay;
> ^^^^^
> The crtc_ prefix is pretty much redundant.
display_mode has members named vdisplay and hdisplay and this avoids any
potential confusion.
>
> > + int psr_max_h = 0, psr_max_v = 0;
>
> And this still reads as "max height" to my brain, but meh.
And here I thought this version leaves no room for confusion :) I should
just ask someone else to write this patch.
>
> >
> > /*
> > * FIXME psr2_support is messed up. It's both computed
> > @@ -462,10 +463,18 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
> > return false;
> >
> > - /* PSR2 is restricted to work with panel resolutions up to 3640x2304 */
> > - if (adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay > 3640 ||
> > - adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay > 2304) {
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, panel resolution too big\n");
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > + psr_max_h = 4096;
> > + psr_max_v = 2304;
> > + } else if (IS_GEN9(dev_priv)) {
> > + psr_max_h = 3640;
> > + psr_max_v = 2304;
> > + }
>
> pre-SKL?
No PSR2 on pre-skl
If we do somehow end up here, returning false and printing a debug
message will be useful.
>
> > +
> > + if (crtc_hdisplay > psr_max_h || crtc_vdisplay > psr_max_v) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, resolution %dx%d > max supported %dx%d\n",
> > + crtc_hdisplay, crtc_vdisplay,
> > + psr_max_h, psr_max_v);
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.14.1
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list