[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 10/10] drm/i915/debugfs: Print sink PSR status

[Pandiyan, Dhinakaran]

On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 19:19 +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 11:28 -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 15:30 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > IGT tests could be improved with sink status, knowing for sure that
> > > hardware have activate or exit PSR.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > v3: rebased
> > > 
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 29
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > index 1dba2c451255..89dc5b05ec24 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > @@ -2603,6 +2603,26 @@ static const char *psr2_live_status(u32 val)
> > >  	return "unknown";
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static const char *psr_sink_self_refresh_status(u8 val)
> > 
> > nit:		     psr_sink_status() is concise,
> > "psr_self_refresh" sounds
> > redundant.
> > 
> > > +{
> > > +	static const char * const sink_status[] = {
> > > +		"inactive",
> > > +		"transitioning to active",
> > 
> > We muddle the meaning of these statuses by paraphrasing, it is better
> > write these strings exactly as the states are defined in the spec.
> > 
> > > +		"active",
> > > +		"active receiving selective update",
> > 
> > For example, this state corresponds to the capture of full static
> > frame
> > too.
> 
> 
> It is fine this way?
> 
> 	static const char * const sink_status[] = {
> 		"inactive",
> 		"transition to active, capture and display",
> 		"active, display from RFB",
> 		"active, capture and display on sink device timings",
> 		"transition to inactive, capture and display, timing
> re-sync",
> 		"reserved",
> 		"reserved",
> 		"sink internal error"
> 	};
> 
> 
Looks good.

> > 
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com> with
> > the nits addressed, thanks for the patch.
> > 
> > > +		"transitioning to inactive",
> > > +		"reserved",
> > > +		"reserved",
> > > +		"sink internal error"
> > > +	};
> > > +
> > > +	val &= DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK;
> > > +	if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(sink_status))
> > > +		return sink_status[val];
> > > +
> > > +	return "unknown";
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m-
> > > >private);
> > > @@ -2684,6 +2704,15 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct
> > > seq_file *m, void *data)
> > >  		seq_printf(m, "EDP_PSR2_STATUS: %x [%s]\n",
> > >  			   psr2, psr2_live_status(psr2));
> > >  	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
> > > +		struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &dev_priv->psr.enabled-
> > > >aux;
> > > +		u8 val;
> > > +
> > > +		if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &val) ==
> > > 1)
> > > +			seq_printf(m, "Sink self refresh status:
> > > 0x%x [%s]\n",
> > > +				   val,
> > > psr_sink_self_refresh_status(val));
> > > +	}
> > >  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> > >  
> > >  	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);