[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/i915/display/icl: HW state readout for transcoder port sync config

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:59:57AM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 05:38:00PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > Op 22-09-2019 om 19:08 schreef Manasi Navare:
> > > After the state is committed, we readout the HW registers and compare
> > > the HW state with the SW state that we just committed.
> > > For Transcdoer port sync, we add master_transcoder and the
> > > salves bitmask to the crtc_state, hence we need to read those during
> > > the HW state readout to avoid pipe state mismatch.
> > >
> > > v4:
> > > * Get power domains in master loop for get_config (Ville)
> > > v3:
> > > * Add TRANSCODER_D (Maarten)
> > > * v3 Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > > v2:
> > > * Add Transcoder_D and MISSING_CASE (Maarten)
> > >
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > index 1ae5eafe2892..711987eb4e9e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > @@ -10470,6 +10470,72 @@ static void haswell_get_ddi_port_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static enum transcoder transcoder_master(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > +					 enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
> > > +{
> > > +	u32 trans_port_sync, master_select;
> > > +
> > > +	trans_port_sync = I915_READ(TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL2(cpu_transcoder));
> > > +
> > > +	if ((trans_port_sync & PORT_SYNC_MODE_ENABLE) == 0)
> > > +		return INVALID_TRANSCODER;
> > > +
> > > +	master_select = trans_port_sync &
> > > +			PORT_SYNC_MODE_MASTER_SELECT_MASK;
> > > +	switch (master_select) {
> > > +	case 1:
> > > +		return TRANSCODER_A;
> > > +	case 2:
> > > +		return TRANSCODER_B;
> > > +	case 3:
> > > +		return TRANSCODER_C;
> > > +	case 4:
> > > +		return TRANSCODER_D;
> > > +	default:
> > > +		MISSING_CASE(master_select);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return INVALID_TRANSCODER;
> > Could move this return up to default. :)
> 
> Yes will do this
> 
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void icelake_get_trans_port_sync_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > > +					       struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> > > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > > +	u32 transcoders;
> > > +	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder;
> > > +
> > > +	pipe_config->master_transcoder = transcoder_master(dev_priv,
> > > +							   pipe_config->cpu_transcoder);
> > > +	if (pipe_config->master_transcoder != INVALID_TRANSCODER) {
> > > +		pipe_config->sync_mode_slaves_mask = 0;
> > > +		return;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > 
> > It could still be useful to go through the loop below anyway, in case we messed up. We are reading out from hw after all.
> >
> 
> The loop below will be called always in case of the HW state readout for master, in case of the slave it will execute
> the firs part, get the master transcoder and return, why do we need to call the loop below for slave? Why cant we just return here
> as in the code?

I think Maarten's point was to catch cases where the same transcoder is
accidentally configure as both slave and master.

>  
> > And then also add this as a PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X check to pipe_config_compare().
> > 
> 
> This is already added in pipe_config_compare() in the patch that adds these two master_trans and slave_bitmask to the crtc state
> 
> Manasi
> 
> > With that fixed and CI happy,
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > > +	transcoders = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) |
> > > +		BIT(TRANSCODER_B) |
> > > +		BIT(TRANSCODER_C) |
> > > +		BIT(TRANSCODER_D);
> > > +	for_each_cpu_transcoder_masked(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder, transcoders) {
> > > +		enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
> > > +		intel_wakeref_t trans_wakeref;
> > > +
> > > +		power_domain = POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER(cpu_transcoder);
> > > +		trans_wakeref = intel_display_power_get_if_enabled(dev_priv,
> > > +								   power_domain);
> > > +
> > > +		if (!trans_wakeref)
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		if (transcoder_master(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder) ==
> > > +		    pipe_config->cpu_transcoder)
> > > +			pipe_config->sync_mode_slaves_mask |= BIT(cpu_transcoder);
> > > +
> > > +		intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain, trans_wakeref);
> > > +	}
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static bool haswell_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > >  				    struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -10566,6 +10632,9 @@ static bool haswell_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > >  		pipe_config->pixel_multiplier = 1;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > > +		icelake_get_trans_port_sync_config(crtc, pipe_config);
> > > +
> > >  out:
> > >  	for_each_power_domain(power_domain, power_domain_mask)
> > >  		intel_display_power_put(dev_priv,
> > 
> > 

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel