[PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/xelp: Add Wa_18022495364

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Tue May 27 19:05:02 UTC 2025


On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 12:06:50PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
>On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:44:12AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> Add Wa_18022495364 as a context indirect workaround.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at igalia.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h |  3 +++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c              | 12 ++++++++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules       |  1 +
>>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h
>> index d1d2592e010d..94d778d5425d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h
>> @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@
>>  #define   PPHWSP_CSB_AND_TIMESTAMP_REPORT_DIS	REG_BIT(14)
>>  #define   CS_PRIORITY_MEM_READ			REG_BIT(7)
>>
>> +#define CS_DEBUG_MODE2(base)			XE_REG((base) + 0xd8, XE_REG_OPTION_MASKED)
>> +#define   INSTRUCTION_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE	REG_BIT(6)
>> +
>>  #define FF_SLICE_CS_CHICKEN1(base)		XE_REG((base) + 0xe0, XE_REG_OPTION_MASKED)
>>  #define   FFSC_PERCTX_PREEMPT_CTRL		REG_BIT(14)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
>> index 6022068ce6b6..9a07fc6d78ab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
>> @@ -1028,6 +1028,15 @@ xelp_emit_cmd_buf_wa(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 *cmd)
>>  	return cmd;
>>  }
>>
>> +static u32 *xelp_invalidate_state_cache(u32 *cmd)
>> +{
>> +	*cmd++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM | MI_LRI_NUM_REGS(1);
>> +	*cmd++ = CS_DEBUG_MODE1(0).addr;
>> +	*cmd++ = _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(INSTRUCTION_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE);
>> +
>> +	return cmd;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static u32 *
>>  xelp_setup_indirect_ctx_rcs(struct xe_lrc *lrc, struct xe_hw_engine *hwe,
>>  			    u32 *cmd)
>> @@ -1037,6 +1046,9 @@ xelp_setup_indirect_ctx_rcs(struct xe_lrc *lrc, struct xe_hw_engine *hwe,
>>  	cmd = xelp_emit_cmd_buf_wa(lrc, cmd);
>>  	cmd = xelp_emit_restore_scratch(lrc, cmd);
>>
>> +	if (XE_WA(lrc->gt, 18022495364))
>> +		cmd = xelp_invalidate_state_cache(cmd);
>
>This is another one where the official workaround description asks us to
>use the per-context workaround bb rather than the indirect context
>workaround bb.  This register is already part of the LRC, so which batch
>buffer gets used determines whether this extra write will happen before
>or after the standard write that would have been part of the LRC
>restore; I'm not sure if that matters or not from a functional
>perspective.

Does it really matter considering this is a masked register? Doesn't
that mean it could just be implemented as an LRC workaround ?

Lucas De Marchi

>
>
>Matt
>
>> +
>>  	return cmd;
>>  }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>> index 9efc5accd43d..a32f5ee9e917 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>>  1607983814	GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1200, 1210)
>> +18022495364	GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1200, 1210)
>>  22012773006	GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1200, 1250)
>>  14014475959	GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1270, 1271), GRAPHICS_STEP(A0, B0)
>>  		PLATFORM(DG2)
>> --
>> 2.48.0
>>
>
>-- 
>Matt Roper
>Graphics Software Engineer
>Linux GPU Platform Enablement
>Intel Corporation


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list