[LDTP-Dev] ldtprunner not so robust?

[Nagappan A]

Hi Tac,

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:18 PM, tac <Junyuan.Tan at sun.com> wrote:

> In previous writings:
> >
> >>        2.  Even  if  "ldtp-daemon" wasn't started  in  background,
> >> ldtprunner  wouldn't
> >> give any complaints and just  quit quietly.
> >>
> > In Linux, we no need to start the daemon, unlesss if it doesn't exist
> > in the path. How does this work in Solaris environment ?
> >
> Currently I am using python 2.4 binding.
> This should also work on Solaris.
>
> After your explanation, I noted:
>         1. Using ldtp without the daemon  should  also be ok and in
> this way scripts should be executed
> correctly without launching a daemon in background.
>         2. As I previously noted, ldtprunner can't do the same thing
> like in 1.


I never noticed this in any of the Linux distribution !!!! We may need to
debug this. Guess ldtp binary is not installed in PATH ?

Thanks
Nagappan

>
>
> just for your reference.
>
> Good day,
>
>   tac
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------
> tac @ Sun China
>      junyuan.tan at sun.com
> extn: +86-10-62673641 intn: 51641
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> LDTP-dev mailing list
> LDTP-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/ldtp-dev
>



-- 
Linux Desktop (GUI Application) Testing Project -
http://ldtp.freedesktop.org
http://nagappanal.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/ldtp-dev/attachments/20090217/eb94b9c2/attachment.html