[LGM] hello LGM2014 content team!

[ale rimoldi]

hi pippin,

> The purpose of these categories/parameters the way I proposed them is
> about distinguishing the type of talks/content from each other. I
> definetly want to have the cateogry of how much live demonstration, be
> it live-coding, actual use of tools or similar there is. The dimension
> you seem to be referring to should be covered by the "artistic"
> slider/dimension - this needs to be clarified. Maybe "artistic" should
> be replaced with "design" - or "visual".
> 
> There is one thing I am opposed to though, that is the use of the
> terms "designer" and "developer" in the call for content, in use these
> categories seem to be mutually exclusive and encourage a
> divide/tribalism that I consider undesirable at LGM.

no, i thought it as a different category than "art", not as an
antinomy... it really would not replace "art".

btw, i don't see any of the category as mutual exclusive with any of
the other ones.
it's about degrees!

among the four category proposed, demo/live just happens to be the one
that is a bit less important *for me* and so it is the one i
would remove if i should only pick 4 labels.

i hope it's more clear now.

ciao
a.l.e