[LGM] LGM 2016 videos - Worth the wait?

[Pat David]

While it's probably worth the extra work, what about pushing the raw videos
and detailing your steps to see if the community picks it up and helps get
these into shape?
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 12:00 PM C R <cajhne at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone.
> After fixing the logo pixelation, I took it a step further and lightened
> up the video with masks to ensure the projector content and the speaker are
> both lit well enough to see. I think you'll agree it looks much less
> cave-like, and helps to compensate for the fact that we couldn't get anyone
> to adjust the spotlights or adjust the camera brightness levels during the
> conference. :)
>
> See the result here:
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/pvz6qie4c6iq2y3/worth_it.mp4?dl=0
>
> Note how clear the font forge logo is on the projector, for example.
>
> Obviously, this change entails more work on my part.
> My question to everyone else, is: Is it worth waiting for the new edits?
> Am I being too much of a perfectionist?
>
> Thanks.
> -C
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libre-graphics-meeting mailing list
> Libre-graphics-meeting at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-graphics-meeting
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libre-graphics-meeting/attachments/20161002/e3b20990/attachment.html>