[Libreoffice-qa] Proposal: Calls for Testing

[MiguelAngel]

El 07/04/12 17:54, Rainer Bielefeld escribió:
> Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb:
>
>> [CFT FEATURE] Better UI for Headers and Footers
>> [CFT 3-5] Copy Paste in Calc
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> It would be great if we could do such tests, but I'm afraid there is not
> much free manpower here on the list for additional tests?!
>
> I, for example dislike to get messages for lot's of test requests
> without having time to proceed them, and developers having subscribed
> here also will not be happy with those additional mails.
>
> Because I am currently trying to reduce mail LibO mail flood because I
> miss too many important mails, it might be that I will have to block
> those [CFT].
>
> I wonder whether for most test requests a Bug would be a more consequent
> solution.
>
> If there has not been a Bug report, the developer creates one with
> Status PLEASETEST (currently not used here), adds descriptions due to
> Bjoern's suggestions, everybody who did tests adds himself to "CC", and
> if someone finds a problem, he submits a new Bug with "Blocks Testbug".
> I believe that would reach possible testers more determined than
> announcements on qa mailing list.
>
> But let's watch what will happen here.
>
> Best regards
>
> Rainer
> _______________________________________________
> List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
> Mail address: Libreoffice-qa at lists.freedesktop.org
> Change settings:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> Problems?
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

I hope people like me is trying to help in QA, but I think is needed a 
right way for this.

For example I did the Litmus test, but seems to me I was the only one.

IMO the better is to begin for the beginning, that is reach a consensus
about the right tool to do and follow the tests, after set the rules and 
then do the tests.

To me the most important is to catch up the regressions asap, because 
this bugs change the expected behavior of the program.

I don't like too much bugzilla, but if it is the only way.

Miguel Ángel.