[Libreoffice] assertion in SwIndexReg::~SwIndexReg

[Stephan Bergmann]

On 12/15/2011 04:29 PM, Terrence Enger wrote:
>    Nowhere is it written that you will understand everything.

Sometimes there are surprising side-effects.  :)

> So, I take it, the helpful question to investigate is the
> reason why the state of the object violates the
> expectation--the expectation that the container is empty--
> that the destructor asserts.  Or, coming from the opposite
> side of the question, why should the destructor expect the
> container to be empty by that time?

Yes.  I would assume that the destructor's expectation is legitimate, 
and that the code keeping the container non-empty is in error.  But 
maybe Michael Stahl can tell you more about this; at least, he recently 
changed that assertion into a true one (aborting the program in a debug 
build), so looks like he considers the assertion correct, too.

Stephan