[Libreoffice] ok to use MacPorts for dependencies??

[David Dumaresq]

On 2011-01-24, at 4:26 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:05 PM, David Dumaresq <dfdumaresq at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Christian, et al,
>> 
>> On 2011-01-24, at 7:00 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi David, *,
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:26 AM, David Dumaresq <dfdumaresq at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2011-01-23, at 7:28 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
>>>>> <eagles051387 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> […]
>>>>> [1] You don't need /any/ external dependency unless you want to
>>>>> compile mozilla/seamonkey from scratch (i.e. when not using
>>>>> --disable-mozilla).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Then you /need/: libIDL and glib2 and gettext (and pkg-config for convenience).
>>>>> 
>>>>> All the other stuff is useless and not needed at all.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But you should get ccache as well, to speed up subsequent builds
>>>>> (http://ccache.samba.org)
>>>> 
>>>> So what you're saying is, if my goal is to develop for libreOffice on OSX, I don't need any of the dependencies mentioned above.
>>> 
>>> Exactly. You only need XCode with the 10.4u SDK when using --disable-mozilla
>>> 
>>> Unless you want to hack on document signing, ldap access or mozilla
>>> address book integration, you don't need mozilla.
>>> 
>>> ciao
>>> Christian
>> 
>> After removing & cleaning up the macport packages (coreutils, etc), I installed git and downloaded the source and attempt to run ./autogen.sh
>> 
>>> ./autogen.sh
>> ./autogen.sh: /usr/local/bin/aclocal: /opt/local/bin/perl: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
>> 
>> I'm not sure what believes perl is in /opt/local/bin? On my system (osx 10.6.6), perl is in /usr/bin
>> 
>> I have since created a sym link and autogen runs, but I wonder if you have any ideas about this?
> 
> Could it be that you had a perl pulled in via macport, and you removed
> it but it was still in the shell hash table ?
> iow: if you remove the link, open a brand new terminal windows and run
> autogen.sh there, do you still have the problem ?

Yes. 

> 
> other possibility. when you use ./autogen.sh, without any parameters,
> it'll try to re-use the parameters you use during the last autogen.sh
> (see autogen.lastrun)
> if you want to make sure that you run an autogen without any parameter you need
> ./autogen.sh --

I'm still seeing it.

./autogen.sh --
./autogen.sh: /usr/local/bin/aclocal: /opt/local/bin/perl: bad interpreter: No such file or directory

> or rm autogen.lastrun  then  autogen.sh
> if your previous autogen.sh run contained --with-perl-home= you would
> pick it up again...
> 
> Norbert


I'll keep digging.

Thanks,
Dave