matus.kukan at gmail.com
Sun Jun 5 15:12:02 PDT 2011
On 4 June 2011 19:03, Matúš Kukan <matus.kukan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> Now, I think I have a very little knowledge of how things work in KCachegrind.
> And I started to doubt if it is possible to do what I thought should
> be done. (maybe everything is possible but it may be too complicated)
> I thought to hide a library we must:
> - all it's functions mark as hidden (and set their cost to 0 or
> something like that)
> - add their cost to callers
> But I think there are no special statistics from which function is
> every part of the cost, so it's not possible to add cost to the
> callers because we don't know how much for each caller.
> I think in the beginning when the callgrind data are loaded it could
> be possible.
> But then there is no way to hide function, except loading data again
> with keeping in mind some functions are hidden and that could be hard
> to achieve. Or not. I'm waiting for your opinion.
> It is pretty possible that I am wrong but if not I'd rather let it be
> because still you can view inclusive cost of each function and ignore
> some libraries.
> (I know it's not the same)
> Hope my mail (and thoughts) is understandable.
I'm sorry but I need to check if it's true what I've written.
I found out the data could be present.
So just ignore for now.
More information about the LibreOffice