building master against mac 10.7.4 using the 10.6 SDK

[Jonathan Aquilina]

I noticed this just now at the start of make.

cd packimages && unset MAKEFLAGS && \
		/Users/eagles051387/core/solenv/bin/build.pl -P4 --all -- -P4 && \
		make -j 4 -rs

Seeing as Mac 10.7.4 is running make 3.81 could i be getting bitten by the -j4 switch above?

i changed my autogen back to i386 and even after running a make clean and rerunning make i get a failure in soltools :(

http://pastebin.com/CYEANUip

the build error log is above.

Seems like when i try and make clean on the soltools module it gives an error below

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
        Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
  For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:
            http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development

  internal build errors:

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /Users/eagles051387/core/soltools/mkdepend

 it seems that the error is inside '', please re-run build
 inside this module to isolate the error and/or test your fix:

build_error.log should contain the captured output of the failed module(s)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To rebuild a specific module:

make .clean # optional
make 

when the problem is isolated and fixed, re-run 'make'
make[1]: *** [soltools] Error 1
make: *** [clean] Error 2

Regards

Jonathan Aquilina



On 22 May 2012, at 15:11, Christian Lohmaier wrote:

> Hi David, *,
> 
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:07 PM,  <d.ostrovsky at idaia.de> wrote:
>> Zitat von Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+libreoffice at googlemail.com>:
>>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
>>> <eagles051387 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I am trying to build master on my mac using clang.
>>>> 
>>>> only modification i made was to build for 64bit.
>>> 
>>> "only modification".... You're a funny one...
>> 
>> have you forgot to place a smily here ;-)
> 
> Well, yes, it is implied :-)
> 
>>> * Neither is building against something else than the 10.4SDK
>>> something that has been tested
> 
> Tor did correct me on that one - so compiling against the 10.6SDK is
> supposed to work, although not an option for builds released for the
> general public for obvious reasons (missing compatibility with 10.4
> and 10.5)
> 
>>> * and even less so is creating a 64bit build on Mac.
>> [...]
>> I could look at 64-bit MacOSX build, if i had mac resources ...
>> Or may be you (or your thinderbox) can compile for me and I would try to do
>> it without mac ;-)?
> 
> "you" as in me? :-)
> Then the answer is "no", as I only have a PPC mac with Mac OSX 10.4 -
> so neither can I try compiling for newer SDKs nor can I try with a
> intel build...
> 
> I might attempt cross-compiling for Intel, but its unlikely that I
> will try it with that machine, since despite beeing quite beefy (Dual
> 2.5Ghz G5, 2GB RAM), compared to Linux the build is dead slow. (fully
> ccached the fastest ones (i.e. those with no changes in between still
> take >100minutes - typical build time is more like 3 to 4 hours)
> 
> "you" as in "whoever reads this"
> Might be an option - as there are tinderboxes that build from ramdisk
> and can complete a build in 15 minutes...
> But I don't see any benefit of a 64bit build.
> 
> ciao
> Christian
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20120522/5080e7e1/attachment-0001.html>