OutputDevice code reorganization
chris.sherlock79 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 16 03:18:50 PDT 2014
I have a good deal of respect for your opinion, I've tried my best to keep
the commit history :-)
Thanks all for the responses!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Kohei Yoshida
<kohei.yoshida at collabora.com>wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 18:56 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 00:22 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > > Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > > > My only request is that the move be done in such a way that git knows
> > > > the files have been moved (in a single commit), rather than the old
> > > > files removed and new one added.
> > > >
> > > That is, for all intents and purposes, not going to work here, when
> > > methods are mixed and matched differently.
> > Oh, I thought he was just relocating the methods. Maybe I
> > mis-understood what he's doing.
> FWIW, from my own experience, I've done a fair amount of large scale
> reorganization in the past, and even if "methods are mixed and matched
> differently", with careful commit strategy you can stil maintain lineage
> of commit history. So, I wouldn't dismiss it right from the start.
> Anyway, ultimately it's all up to Chris since (as Norbert said) he's the
> one making this all happen. Mine was nothing more than just a humble
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the LibreOffice