Testing/Working on PyUNO?
Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com
Wed Feb 19 17:55:43 CET 2014
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:37:00AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 17:27 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:19:53AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > > Yet, it's the core developers who will likely be called in to answer
> > > "hey my build failed with this python test, tell me what's wrong!!!"
> >
> > In subsequentcheck? If that should indeed be the case even then, we can make a
> > separate "make pythoncheck" target.
> >
> > > Now you are the one being academic here. Stick to the topic please,
> > > which is whether or not Python tests should be used to test core
> > > functionality. Nobody is talking about boost here.
> >
> > I am talking about testing the _product_ here.
>
> And I'm talking about what tools should be used to test what part of the
> product. I think you are at one level above us. No wonder we are
> talking past each other.
Yes, there is a difference between:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integration_testing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_testing
and both have their use, but are very different beasts. I think, if we dont mix
them up, we can have both, handle them differently and all be happy.
Best,
Bjoern
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list