ESC call Thursday 16:00 central European time ...
simos.lists at googlemail.com
Thu Oct 9 02:16:21 PDT 2014
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Andras Timar <timar74 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Michael Stahl <mstahl at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>> The issue is in the decision to backport the first patch without the
> >>> configuration option (fdo#81309 only) to 4.3.1 and 4.2.7
> >> It was because of the translation requirement that the backport would
> >> add.
> > do we really have to make ourselves slaves to un-changeable processes
> > like "there shall be no new strings in bugfix releases", no matter the
> > circumstances?
> AFAIK there is no policy like "there shall be no new strings in bugfix
> releases". The only thing localizers and Pootle maintaners ask, that
> such change should be announced to them, so they have a chance to
Can that be done automatically by some script (like in GNOME)?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the LibreOffice