Killing obsolete Jenkins builds

[Philippe Jung]

Just in case,
Do you know
git commit --amend to update last commit before pushing it to gerrit
And
git rebase -i HEAD~5 to rewrite your local commit history including for exemple modify the third commit, merge commits 1 3 and 4 into a single one?
Philippe


Le 19 novembre 2015 04:20:03 CET, Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash at gmail.com> a écrit :
>On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Ashod Nakashian
><ashnakash at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > (Sorry if this has already been discussed/considered.)
>> >
>> > Once a patch is pushed to Gerrit a Jenkins build automatically
>starts.
>> And
>> > once subsequent patches are pushed the cycle repeats.
>> >
>> > Is there a reason to keep running the builds of (old) patches that
>will
>> not
>> > get cherry picked?
>>
>> Is there a reason to keep pushing these patches then ?
>> Just stop building patch over patch and pushing them in bulk.. and
>> make your patch independent of each other as much as possible.
>>
>
>Sorry, I didn't explain well.
>
>The patches are related. They are updates based on feedback, partial
>failure or improvement.
>
>They aren't bulk pushes (whatever that means). They are updates on a
>single
>changeset.
>
>Why do people send multiple patches per push? That's the right question
>to
>ask.
>
>And the answer is: to improve the previous patch.
>
>Hence my question. If a patch has partially failed, or I got feedback
>to
>improve it, or (insert reason here), and I want to push an update, why
>should the previous patch still build when it's not necessary?
>
>Hope this makes sense.
>
>
>>
>> iow: make a patch, push it to gerrit, come back to 'master' make
>> another patch, push it to gerrit etc.
>> and _not_
>> make a patch, push it to gerrit
>> git pull -r
>> make another patch (on top of the non merged patch you just pushed to
>> gerrit), push it to gerrit => both patch get rebuilt
>> etc..
>>
>>
>Obviously I'm not doing that. Obviously.
>
>
>>
>> >
>> > To me it looks completely wasteful to spend hours building a few
>patches
>> > that were pushed one after the other when only the last one is
>relevant.
>>
>> Then do not push new version of 'irrelevant' patches
>>
>> > Not
>> > only it is wasteful to valuable shared resources, but the user is
>> punished
>>
>> again, do not do that then.
>>
>> Norbert
>>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>LibreOffice mailing list
>LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
>http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20151119/41693432/attachment.html>