AW: [EXTERN]-Re[6]: Building LO from source

Fri Jun 12 09:22:14 UTC 2020

Thanks Julian,

I now checked my system and Java Options under Advanced tab is unchecked 
and that panel is passive. Thus, I cannot add or edit any Java 
parameters. Is it related with compile parameters?

Regards

------ Original Message ------
From: "Kalinowski, Julian" <julian.kalinowski at dataport.de>
To: "Ismet Bahadir" <ismetbahadir at gmail.com>; "Regis Perdreau" 
<regis.perdreau at gmail.com>; "libreoffice-dev" 
<libreoffice at lists.freedesktop.org>
Sent: 12-Jun-20 12:09:00 PM
Subject: AW: [EXTERN]-Re[6]: Building LO from source

>Hi,
>
>Regarding your problem installing extensions, I remember having the 
>same Error message when I enabled Java Debugging inside LO to debug 
>extensions.
>
>In Options – Advanced – Parameters (or similar, my UI is in german), I 
>added some java parameters so I can attach a debugger (as described 
>here: 
>https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_debug#Debugging_Java_components_in_LibreOffice 
><https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_debug#Debugging_Java_components_in_LibreOffice>)
>
>
>
>When these options were set and I did NOT have a debugger attached, I 
>got the same error message when trying to install an extension.
>
>So you may check if there are JVM options set and remove them or attach 
>a debugger and try installing your extension again.
>
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Julian
>
>
>
>Von: LibreOffice [mailto:libreoffice-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] Im 
>Auftrag von Ismet Bahadir
>Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Juni 2020 08:42
>An: Regis Perdreau <regis.perdreau at gmail.com>; libreoffice-dev 
><libreoffice at lists.freedesktop.org>
>Betreff: [EXTERN]-Re[6]: Building LO from source
>
>
>
>Hi Regis,
>
>
>
>I didn't use --without-doxygen option. I'll add this, hopefully, it 
>will compile much faster.
>
>
>
>The institution I'm giving LO is asking to remove some of the "apps" 
>that they are not going to use. Those apps may stay in the compiled 
>package, but I don't want users to see those apps. It's like installing 
>MS Office with unchecking MS Access. The office software is still fully 
>functional, but the users can't use or even see Access app. This is 
>what I want to do with LO.
>
>
>
>Regards
>
>
>
>------ Original Message ------
>
>From: "Regis Perdreau" <regis.perdreau at gmail.com>
>
>To: "libreoffice-dev" <libreoffice at lists.freedesktop.org>
>
>Sent: 12-Jun-20 9:22:06 AM
>
>Subject: Re: Re[4]: Building LO from source
>
>
>
>>HI Ismet,
>>
>>I can confirm (IMHO) that you can't exclude easily some part from LO, 
>>it's not designed in this way...For example, Impress depends from 
>>Draw. You need Calc to embed sheets in Writer, etc...
>>
>>Have you set an autogen.input file to exclude the doxygen 
>>documentation (--without-doxygen) ?...It takes ages on my computer to 
>>be generated.
>>
>>On my computer, a ridiculous core I3-6100 8Go nowadays, it takes 
>>around 2h to compile LO from scratch under Linux.
>>
>>
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>
>>Régis Perdreau
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Le ven. 12 juin 2020 à 07:59, Ismet Bahadir <ismetbahadir at gmail.com> a 
>>écrit :
>>
>>>Thank you very much Tor,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes, I didn't know the terminology, so I trusted that you would 
>>>understand :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>It takes over 5 hours to compile on my pc but I have a powerful 
>>>machine with 64 cores and 128 GM ram. I think that will be faster.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I'll try and get back to you. But I still do not know why the 
>>>extension successfully installs on Ubuntu but fails on Debian.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>------ Original Message ------
>>>
>>>From: "Tor Lillqvist" <tml at iki.fi>
>>>
>>>To: "Ismet Bahadir" <ismetbahadir at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>Cc: "Stephan Bergmann" <sbergman at redhat.com>; "libreoffice-dev" 
>>><libreoffice at lists.freedesktop.org>
>>>
>>>Sent: 12-Jun-20 8:55:57 AM
>>>
>>>Subject: Re: Re[2]: Building LO from source
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I think it's best to recompile the source from scratch with 
>>>>>official DEB
>>>>>packaging system.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>IMHO, as an outsider, only Debian's own way to package LibreOffice 
>>>>can be said to be "official". It is *very* different from the way 
>>>>TDF packages LibreOffice in the .deb format.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>How can I exclude some of the apps such as "Draw"?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Draw (and Writer, Calc, etc) are not "apps" as such IMHO but 
>>>>different kinds of documents that the one same app, LibreOffice, 
>>>>manages using the same soffice.bin process. But that is just 
>>>>terminology, we know what you mean.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Is it possible that
>>>>>each app has its own DEB installation file so that I won't be 
>>>>>installing
>>>>>it if I skip its DEB file?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That *is* exactly how the real Debian packages for LibreOffice are 
>>>>structured. See https://packages.debian.org/buster/libreoffice Also 
>>>>many (most?) other Linux distros, like Fedora for instance, split 
>>>>LibreOffice into multiple packages, like libreoffice-core, 
>>>>libreoffice-writer, libreoffice-calc, libreoffice-draw, etc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>(As such, I don't think that it makes sense to split up LibreOffice 
>>>>like that, I find it fairly pointless, old-fashioned and needlessly 
>>>>complex, but then I am not a Linux zealot, I like macOS more. But 
>>>>just ignore me here.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--tml
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>LibreOffice mailing list
>>>LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20200612/0131bb3d/attachment-0001.htm>