[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/10] i965: Implement hiz and separate stencil for window framebuffer

Ian Romanick idr at freedesktop.org
Sun Jun 5 10:41:25 PDT 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/05/2011 02:44 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> I have a naive question: why are we allocating stencil/depth/aux buffers
> through X/DRI2?
> 
> I can understand for the sake of interoperability why the color buffer
> attachments are negotiated with X, but I can't see any reason why X
> wants to know about the others.

Because multiple processes can render to the same window, pbuffer, or
pixmap, and they'll want the same set of buffers.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk3rv8UACgkQX1gOwKyEAw+F5wCgjUAuyABkolANadSNngaKjjUo
t2oAnjAltSzRiIYMXT+Xoad/FqscgOzd
=++lE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list