[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radeonsi: cleanup disabling tiling for UVD
Michel Dänzer
michel at daenzer.net
Mon Apr 22 00:35:49 PDT 2013
On Sam, 2013-04-20 at 13:21 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> From: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>
> Should fix: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63702
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> ---
> src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/radeonsi_uvd.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/radeonsi_uvd.c b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/radeonsi_uvd.c
> index d49c088..20d079f 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/radeonsi_uvd.c
> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/radeonsi_uvd.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct pipe_video_buffer *radeonsi_video_buffer_create(struct pipe_context *pipe
> template.height = align(tmpl->height / depth, VL_MACROBLOCK_HEIGHT);
>
> vl_vide_buffer_template(&templ, &template, resource_formats[0], depth, PIPE_USAGE_STATIC, 0);
> + templ.flags = R600_RESOURCE_FLAG_TRANSFER;
> resources[0] = (struct r600_resource_texture *)
> pipe->screen->resource_create(pipe->screen, &templ);
> if (!resources[0])
Are these resources really used as transfers, i.e. for accessing data
with the CPU? If not, I think it would be better to add a new
R600_RESOURCE_* flag instead of (ab)using R600_RESOURCE_FLAG_TRANSFER
for this.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list