[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] gallium/docs: minor clarification for TXQ instruction
Brian Paul
brianp at vmware.com
Thu Jul 10 10:13:17 PDT 2014
On 07/10/2014 09:50 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Brian Paul <brianp at vmware.com> wrote:
>>> ---
>>> src/gallium/docs/source/tgsi.rst | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/gallium/docs/source/tgsi.rst b/src/gallium/docs/source/tgsi.rst
>>> index 8cbb3d8..c267b2c 100644
>>> --- a/src/gallium/docs/source/tgsi.rst
>>> +++ b/src/gallium/docs/source/tgsi.rst
>>> @@ -968,6 +968,8 @@ XXX doesn't look like most of the opcodes really belong here.
>>> Also return the number of accessible levels (last_level - first_level + 1)
>>> in W.
>>>
>>> + For components that aren't used, the returned values are undefined.
>>> +
>>
>> Perhaps I'm just not seeing something obvious... but what does this
>> mean? I'm reading this as "If you don't look at a component of the
>> return value, then unbeknownst to you, since you're not looking at it,
>> the value is undefined."
>
> Oh. I just got what you were saying. Perhaps phrase this as
>
> "For non-existent dimensions, the returned values are undefined"?
How about, "For components which don't return a resource dimension,
their value is undefined." ?
-Brian
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list