[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/4] r600/sb_sched: fix what appears to be a typo in a condition

[Marek Olšák]

I'd like somebody who knows r600/sb to review this. Glenn, can I
bother you please? :)

Marek

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Martin Peres
<martin.peres at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  src/gallium/drivers/r600/sb/sb_sched.cpp | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/sb/sb_sched.cpp b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/sb/sb_sched.cpp
> index 2e38a62..6268078 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/sb/sb_sched.cpp
> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/sb/sb_sched.cpp
> @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ bool alu_group_tracker::try_reserve(alu_node* n) {
>
>         n->bc.bank_swizzle = 0;
>
> -       if (!trans & fbs)
> +       if (!trans && fbs)
>                 n->bc.bank_swizzle = VEC_210;
>
>         if (gpr.try_reserve(n)) {
> --
> 2.4.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev