[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] mesa: merge bind_xfb_buffers_{base|range}

Nicolai Hähnle nhaehnle at gmail.com
Fri Jan 8 16:45:13 PST 2016


On 08.01.2016 18:27, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 01/08/2016 08:44 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>> From: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle at amd.com>
>>
>> Reduced code duplication should make the code more maintainable.
>> ---
>>   src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
>> index d7c5680..1d221de 100644
>> --- a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
>> +++ b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
>> @@ -3537,84 +3537,19 @@ unbind_xfb_buffers(struct gl_context *ctx,
>>   }
>>
>>   static void
>> -bind_xfb_buffers_base(struct gl_context *ctx,
>> -                      GLuint first, GLsizei count,
>> -                      const GLuint *buffers)
>> -{
>> -   struct gl_transform_feedback_object *tfObj =
>> -      ctx->TransformFeedback.CurrentObject;
>> -   GLint i;
>> -
>> -   if (!error_check_bind_xfb_buffers(ctx, tfObj, first, count,
>> -                                     "glBindBuffersBase"))
>> -      return;
>> -
>> -   /* Assume that at least one binding will be changed */
>> -   FLUSH_VERTICES(ctx, 0);
>> -   ctx->NewDriverState |= ctx->DriverFlags.NewTransformFeedback;
>> -
>> -   if (!buffers) {
>> -      /* The ARB_multi_bind spec says:
>> -       *
>> -       *   "If <buffers> is NULL, all bindings from <first> through
>> -       *    <first>+<count>-1 are reset to their unbound (zero) state."
>> -       */
>> -      unbind_xfb_buffers(ctx, tfObj, first, count);
>> -      return;
>> -   }
>> -
>> -   /* Note that the error semantics for multi-bind commands differ from
>> -    * those of other GL commands.
>> -    *
>> -    * The Issues section in the ARB_multi_bind spec says:
>> -    *
>> -    *    "(11) Typically, OpenGL specifies that if an error is generated by a
>> -    *          command, that command has no effect.  This is somewhat
>> -    *          unfortunate for multi-bind commands, because it would require a
>> -    *          first pass to scan the entire list of bound objects for errors
>> -    *          and then a second pass to actually perform the bindings.
>> -    *          Should we have different error semantics?
>> -    *
>> -    *       RESOLVED:  Yes.  In this specification, when the parameters for
>> -    *       one of the <count> binding points are invalid, that binding point
>> -    *       is not updated and an error will be generated.  However, other
>> -    *       binding points in the same command will be updated if their
>> -    *       parameters are valid and no other error occurs."
>> -    */
>> -
>> -   _mesa_begin_bufferobj_lookups(ctx);
>> -
>> -   for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> -      struct gl_buffer_object * const boundBufObj = tfObj->Buffers[first + i];
>> -      struct gl_buffer_object *bufObj;
>> -
>> -      if (boundBufObj && boundBufObj->Name == buffers[i])
>> -         bufObj = boundBufObj;
>> -      else
>> -         bufObj = _mesa_multi_bind_lookup_bufferobj(ctx, buffers, i,
>> -                                                    "glBindBuffersBase");
>> -
>> -      if (bufObj)
>> -         _mesa_set_transform_feedback_binding(ctx, tfObj, first + i,
>> -                                              bufObj, 0, 0);
>> -   }
>> -
>> -   _mesa_end_bufferobj_lookups(ctx);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void
>> -bind_xfb_buffers_range(struct gl_context *ctx,
>> -                       GLuint first, GLsizei count,
>> -                       const GLuint *buffers,
>> -                       const GLintptr *offsets,
>> -                       const GLsizeiptr *sizes)
>> +bind_xfb_buffers(struct gl_context *ctx,
>> +                 GLuint first, GLsizei count,
>> +                 const GLuint *buffers,
>> +                 GLboolean range,
>
> If you use bool, true, and false instead of the GL names, the series is
>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com>

Done.

I've actually been wondering what the deal is with all those different 
boolean types. From what you've written, I'd infer that the intent is 
roughly like:

1) GLboolean/GL_TRUE/GL_FALSE for values where the API wants it.
2) bool/true/false everywhere else.
3) boolean/TRUE/FALSE... who knows?

... and this happens to be inconsistent for historical reasons. Does 
that sound right?

Thanks,
Nicolai

>
>> +                 const GLintptr *offsets,
>> +                 const GLsizeiptr *sizes,
>> +                 const char *caller)
>>   {
>>      struct gl_transform_feedback_object *tfObj =
>>          ctx->TransformFeedback.CurrentObject;
>>      GLint i;
>>
>> -   if (!error_check_bind_xfb_buffers(ctx, tfObj, first, count,
>> -                                     "glBindBuffersRange"))
>> +   if (!error_check_bind_xfb_buffers(ctx, tfObj, first, count, caller))
>>         return;
>>
>>      /* Assume that at least one binding will be changed */
>> @@ -3659,55 +3594,64 @@ bind_xfb_buffers_range(struct gl_context *ctx,
>>         const GLuint index = first + i;
>>         struct gl_buffer_object * const boundBufObj = tfObj->Buffers[index];
>>         struct gl_buffer_object *bufObj;
>> +      GLintptr offset = 0;
>> +      GLsizeiptr size = 0;
>>
>> -      if (!bind_buffers_check_offset_and_size(ctx, i, offsets, sizes))
>> -         continue;
>> +      if (range) {
>> +         offset = offsets[i];
>> +         size = sizes[i];
>>
>> -      /* The ARB_multi_bind spec says:
>> -       *
>> -       *     "An INVALID_VALUE error is generated by BindBuffersRange if any
>> -       *      pair of values in <offsets> and <sizes> does not respectively
>> -       *      satisfy the constraints described for those parameters for the
>> -       *      specified target, as described in section 6.7.1 (per binding)."
>> -       *
>> -       * Section 6.7.1 refers to table 6.5, which says:
>> -       *
>> -       *     "┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
>> -       *      │ Transform feedback array bindings (see sec. 13.2.2)           │
>> -       *      ├───────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┤
>> -       *      │    ...                │    ...                                │
>> -       *      │    offset restriction │    multiple of 4                      │
>> -       *      │    ...                │    ...                                │
>> -       *      │    size restriction   │    multiple of 4                      │
>> -       *      └───────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────┘"
>> -       */
>> -      if (offsets[i] & 0x3) {
>> -         _mesa_error(ctx, GL_INVALID_VALUE,
>> -                     "glBindBuffersRange(offsets[%u]=%" PRId64
>> -                     " is misaligned; it must be a multiple of 4 when "
>> -                     "target=GL_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_BUFFER)",
>> -                     i, (int64_t) offsets[i]);
>> -         continue;
>> -      }
>> +         if (!bind_buffers_check_offset_and_size(ctx, i, offsets, sizes))
>> +            continue;
>>
>> -      if (sizes[i] & 0x3) {
>> -         _mesa_error(ctx, GL_INVALID_VALUE,
>> -                     "glBindBuffersRange(sizes[%u]=%" PRId64
>> -                     " is misaligned; it must be a multiple of 4 when "
>> -                     "target=GL_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_BUFFER)",
>> -                     i, (int64_t) sizes[i]);
>> -         continue;
>> +         /* The ARB_multi_bind spec says:
>> +          *
>> +          *     "An INVALID_VALUE error is generated by BindBuffersRange if any
>> +          *      pair of values in <offsets> and <sizes> does not respectively
>> +          *      satisfy the constraints described for those parameters for the
>> +          *      specified target, as described in section 6.7.1 (per binding)."
>> +          *
>> +          * Section 6.7.1 refers to table 6.5, which says:
>> +          *
>> +          *     "┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
>> +          *      │ Transform feedback array bindings (see sec. 13.2.2)           │
>> +          *      ├───────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┤
>> +          *      │    ...                │    ...                                │
>> +          *      │    offset restriction │    multiple of 4                      │
>> +          *      │    ...                │    ...                                │
>> +          *      │    size restriction   │    multiple of 4                      │
>> +          *      └───────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────┘"
>> +          */
>> +         if (offsets[i] & 0x3) {
>> +            _mesa_error(ctx, GL_INVALID_VALUE,
>> +                        "glBindBuffersRange(offsets[%u]=%" PRId64
>> +                        " is misaligned; it must be a multiple of 4 when "
>> +                        "target=GL_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_BUFFER)",
>> +                        i, (int64_t) offsets[i]);
>> +            continue;
>> +         }
>> +
>> +         if (sizes[i] & 0x3) {
>> +            _mesa_error(ctx, GL_INVALID_VALUE,
>> +                        "glBindBuffersRange(sizes[%u]=%" PRId64
>> +                        " is misaligned; it must be a multiple of 4 when "
>> +                        "target=GL_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_BUFFER)",
>> +                        i, (int64_t) sizes[i]);
>> +            continue;
>> +         }
>> +
>> +         offset = offsets[i];
>> +         size = sizes[i];
>>         }
>>
>>         if (boundBufObj && boundBufObj->Name == buffers[i])
>>            bufObj = boundBufObj;
>>         else
>> -         bufObj = _mesa_multi_bind_lookup_bufferobj(ctx, buffers, i,
>> -                                                    "glBindBuffersRange");
>> +         bufObj = _mesa_multi_bind_lookup_bufferobj(ctx, buffers, i, caller);
>>
>>         if (bufObj)
>>            _mesa_set_transform_feedback_binding(ctx, tfObj, index, bufObj,
>> -                                              offsets[i], sizes[i]);
>> +                                              offset, size);
>>      }
>>
>>      _mesa_end_bufferobj_lookups(ctx);
>> @@ -4068,7 +4012,8 @@ _mesa_BindBuffersRange(GLenum target, GLuint first, GLsizei count,
>>
>>      switch (target) {
>>      case GL_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_BUFFER:
>> -      bind_xfb_buffers_range(ctx, first, count, buffers, offsets, sizes);
>> +      bind_xfb_buffers(ctx, first, count, buffers, GL_TRUE, offsets, sizes,
>> +                       "glBindBuffersRange");
>>         return;
>>      case GL_UNIFORM_BUFFER:
>>         bind_uniform_buffers_range(ctx, first, count, buffers, offsets, sizes);
>> @@ -4101,7 +4046,8 @@ _mesa_BindBuffersBase(GLenum target, GLuint first, GLsizei count,
>>
>>      switch (target) {
>>      case GL_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_BUFFER:
>> -      bind_xfb_buffers_base(ctx, first, count, buffers);
>> +      bind_xfb_buffers(ctx, first, count, buffers, GL_FALSE, NULL, NULL,
>> +                       "glBindBuffersBase");
>>         return;
>>      case GL_UNIFORM_BUFFER:
>>         bind_uniform_buffers_base(ctx, first, count, buffers);
>>
>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list