[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/va: restore old buffer format on error
Eric Engestrom
eric.engestrom at imgtec.com
Thu Jun 2 09:34:03 UTC 2016
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 02:54:06PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> On the other hand the original code was correct in the first place.
>
> And as Julien noted Coverity tries to restore the template buffer format
> from a local variable which doesn't exists any more where you wanted to add
> the line.
>
> So Coverity creates code which won't compile and needs to be fixed instead.
I guess the lesson for me is to not try and fix stuff in code I don't
understand at all :]
Sorry for wasting your time with this.
Cheers,
Eric
>
> Christian.
>
> Am 31.05.2016 um 14:51 schrieb Christian König:
> > Yeah, that solution looks more correct to me.
> >
> > Christian.
> >
> > Am 31.05.2016 um 14:44 schrieb Julien Isorce:
> > > Hi,
> > > Thx for looking at it but are you sure your diff compiles ?
> > >
> > > Can you try this instead:
> > >
> > > --- a/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/image.c
> > > +++ b/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/image.c
> > > @@ -471,19 +471,19 @@ vlVaPutImage(VADriverContextP ctx, VASurfaceID
> > > surface, VAImageID image,
> > >
> > > if (format != surf->buffer->buffer_format) {
> > > struct pipe_video_buffer *tmp_buf;
> > > - enum pipe_format old_surf_format = surf->templat.buffer_format;
> > > + struct pipe_video_buffer templat = surf->templat;
> > >
> > > - surf->templat.buffer_format = format;
> > > - tmp_buf = drv->pipe->create_video_buffer(drv->pipe,
> > > &surf->templat);
> > > + templat.buffer_format = format;
> > > + tmp_buf = drv->pipe->create_video_buffer(drv->pipe, &templat);
> > >
> > > if (!tmp_buf) {
> > > - surf->templat.buffer_format = old_surf_format;
> > > pipe_mutex_unlock(drv->mutex);
> > > return VA_STATUS_ERROR_ALLOCATION_FAILED;
> > > }
> > >
> > > surf->buffer->destroy(surf->buffer);
> > > surf->buffer = tmp_buf;
> > > + surf->templat.buffer_format = format;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Julien
> > >
> > >
> > > On 31 May 2016 at 08:43, Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com
> > > <mailto:christian.koenig at amd.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 31.05.2016 um 03:24 schrieb Eric Engestrom:
> > >
> > > CoverityID: 1337953
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric at engestrom.ch>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Note that I do not know this code at all; I'm blindly
> > > following Coverity's advice on this one :]
> > >
> > >
> > > Well and that is completely nonsense. The buffer was already
> > > reallocated when this error happens and so resetting the template
> > > to the original value is incorrect and actually rather dangerous.
> > >
> > > Why does Coverity things that we should add this? And how can we
> > > fix this?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Christian.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > src/gallium/state_trackers/va/image.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/image.c
> > > b/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/image.c
> > > index 92d014c..8cfe17a 100644
> > > --- a/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/image.c
> > > +++ b/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/image.c
> > > @@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ vlVaPutImage(VADriverContextP ctx,
> > > VASurfaceID surface, VAImageID image,
> > > views =
> > > surf->buffer->get_sampler_view_planes(surf->buffer);
> > > if (!views) {
> > > + surf->templat.buffer_format = old_surf_format;
> > > pipe_mutex_unlock(drv->mutex);
> > > return VA_STATUS_ERROR_OPERATION_FAILED;
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mesa-dev mailing list
> > > mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > <mailto:mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org>
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list