[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2] swr: automake: don't ship LLVM version specific generated sources
Chuck Atkins
chuck.atkins at kitware.com
Thu Jun 16 14:55:29 UTC 2016
So, I can confirm that with this patch applied to the rc3 tag, I can
generate a tarball on Arch with make dist, and then use said tarball to
build with SWR enabled on fedora. So:
Tested-by: Chuck Atkins <chuck.atkins at kitware.com>
- Chuck
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 14 June 2016 at 18:06, Rowley, Timothy O <timothy.o.rowley at intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Jun 13, 2016, at 8:03 PM, Rowley, Timothy O <
> timothy.o.rowley at intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> A clean tree build works with this version, but distcheck fails:
> >>
> >> ...
> >> rm -f config.status config.cache config.log configure.lineno
> config.status.lineno
> >> rm -f Makefile
> >> ERROR: files left in build directory after distclean:
> >> ./src/gallium/drivers/swr/rasterizer/jitter/builder_gen.cpp
> >> ./src/gallium/drivers/swr/rasterizer/jitter/builder_x86.cpp
> >> ./src/gallium/drivers/swr/rasterizer/jitter/builder_gen.h
> >> make[1]: *** [distcleancheck] Error 1
> >> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/home/torowley/work/mesa-opt/mesa-12.1.0-devel/_build'
> >> make: *** [distcheck] Error 1
> >>
> >> Not sure how builder_x86.cpp managed to change its status.
> >
> > To answer my own question: the reason for builder_x86.cpp being
> regenerated is because of its dependency on builder_gen.h (through
> builder.h).
> >
> I thought that one was mentioned is the big comment in the patch.
> Perhaps my wording could be improved - any suggestions ?
>
> And yes, due to the missing dependency the file will be (re)generated
> at a later stage thus we'll need to add yet another workaround for
> that. Just listing the whole lot in CLEANFILES should be enough.
>
> Feel free to give it a try, or I'll do at some point later on today.
>
> Thanks,
> Emil
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20160616/a2b1d165/attachment.html>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list