[Mesa-dev] mesa-dev is failing to bounce some mails

[Emil Velikov]

On 27 October 2016 at 12:41, Andres Gomez <agomez at igalia.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 12:14 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 27 October 2016 at 12:06, Andres Gomez <agomez at igalia.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 19:35 +0300, Andres Gomez wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > recently, we have noticed that we are not receiving some of the mails
>> > > that we have sent to the ML.
>> > >
>> > > The mails are archived, though, but we don't get the copy from the ML.
>> > >
>> > > We were checking if this was a problem in our side. However, we've
>> > > checked that they don't appear either in patchwork so we think that
>> > > this is a problem with mesa-dev ML.
>> > >
>> > > Some of those missing mails are:
>> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/2016-October/021150.html
>> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-October/133400.html
>> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-October/133417.html
>> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-October/133416.html
>> > >
>> > > I hope this mail arrives and it is enough to check if there is some
>> > > problem.
>> > >
>> > > Please, let me know if you want me to open a bug at b.f.o
>> >
>> >
>> > The missing mails have been arriving along this morning.
>> >
>>
>> Hi Andres,
>>
>> Skimming through the above they have arrived in timely manner over here.
>> It might be worth checking if it's not something on your end - ISP
>> and/or local infra.
>
> Hi Emil,
>
> We already did that check. It seems everything is fine.
>
> As I commented, they were not appearing in patchwork either ... until
> this morning. Yesterday, I went here:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/mesa/patches/?submitter=15150
>
> And:
> [PATCH 3/8] glsl: ignore all but the rightmost layout qualifier name from the rightmost layout qualifier
> [PATCH 7/8] Revert "glsl: allow layout qualifier overrides with ARB_shading_language_420pack"
>
/me was looking at older/another version of the patch(es)

So yes, I should have checked after finishing my coffee :-)

Thanks for the correction gents.
Emil