[Mesa-dev] Mesa 13.0.0 release plan (Was Re: Mesa 12.1.0 release plan (Was Re: Next Mesa release, anyone?))

Timothy Arceri timothy.arceri at collabora.com
Fri Sep 30 02:31:36 UTC 2016


On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 19:17 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> 
> > On Sep 29, 2016 5:14 PM, "Timothy Arceri" <timothy.arceri at collabora.c
om> wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> > On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 15:56 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> 
> > > > > On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com>
wrote:
> 
> > > >
> 
> > > > Hi,
> 
> > > >
> 
> > > > > It's been almost 4 months since the 12.0 branch was created,
and
> 
> > > > soon
> 
> > > > it will have been 3 months since Mesa 12.0 was released.
> 
> > > >
> 
> > > > Is there any reason we haven't created the stable branch yet?
> 
> > > >
> 
> > > > > Ideally, we would time the release so that it's 1-2 months
before
> 
> > > > fall
> 
> > > > distribution releases.
> 
> > > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Thanks Marek !
> 
> > >
> 
> > > > In all honesty I was secretly hoping that we'll get Dave/Bas RADV
for
> 
> > > 12.1.
> 
> >
> 
> > I believe the release should be 13?? Core Mesa and the Intel driver
> 
> > > have reached 4.4 this release also core Mesa is now at 4.5 despite
not
> 
> > being enabled anywhere.
> > > > > > My personal preference, for whatever it's worth, would be to call it
12.1.  The 12.0 release was the biggest release we've had in a long
time and it seems odd to me to jump to 13.0 right away when we really
haven't done much at all in terms of new features. (I think it's only
2 or 3 desktop features in the case of Intel.  A bit more on the ES
side I guess).

My understanding is the major version has only ever been bumped when
full support for a new desktop OpenGL version has been reached
regardless of the number of extensions enabled. We did the same thing
going from 8.0 > 9.0 were as the 7 release went all the way to 7.11
over a 4 year period. It seems odd to change the way we bump versions
at this point in time, although in future maybe it will need to be
based on Vulkin versions also.

> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With the topic of which would be 'the default' Vulkan driver for

> > ATI/AMD hardware to be considered at a later stage.

> >

> > That said here are the tentative dates:

> >

> > Oct 7/14 2016 - Feature freeze/Release candidate 1

> > Oct 14/21 2016 - Release candidate 2

> > Oct 21/28 2016 - Release candidate 3/final release

> >

> > Fwiw I'm still in favour of getting RADV in even if it's not

> > perfect/feature complete. Devs, let me know if there's a "must have"

> > feature that we want in 12.1.

> >

> > Thanks

> > Emil

> > _______________________________________________

> > mesa-dev mailing list

> > mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org

> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

> _______________________________________________

> mesa-dev mailing list

> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org

> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

> > > _______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20160930/9b1a25a7/attachment.html>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list