[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 7/8] st/mesa: explicitly handle/list 64bit ops in visit_expression()

Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Thu Jan 26 13:18:42 UTC 2017


From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>

Follow the approach set in the file and handle all the ops, as otherwise
the compiler throws a bunch of lovely warnings.

Note that some versions of GCC have -Wswitch implied by -Wall, latter of
which set in out autoconf and scons builds.

Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
---
 src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
index a437645d9e..b154fad185 100644
--- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
@@ -2319,6 +2319,33 @@ glsl_to_tgsi_visitor::visit_expression(ir_expression* ir, st_src_reg *op)
    case ir_binop_carry:
    case ir_binop_borrow:
    case ir_unop_ssbo_unsized_array_length:
+   case ir_unop_bitcast_i642d:
+   case ir_unop_bitcast_d2u64:
+   case ir_unop_bitcast_d2i64:
+   case ir_unop_i642i:
+   case ir_unop_u642i:
+   case ir_unop_i642u:
+   case ir_unop_u642u:
+   case ir_unop_i642b:
+   case ir_unop_i642f:
+   case ir_unop_u642f:
+   case ir_unop_i642d:
+   case ir_unop_u642d:
+   case ir_unop_i2i64:
+   case ir_unop_u2i64:
+   case ir_unop_b2i64:
+   case ir_unop_f2i64:
+   case ir_unop_d2i64:
+   case ir_unop_i2u64:
+   case ir_unop_u2u64:
+   case ir_unop_f2u64:
+   case ir_unop_d2u64:
+   case ir_unop_u642i64:
+   case ir_unop_i642u64:
+   case ir_unop_pack_int_2x32:
+   case ir_unop_pack_uint_2x32:
+   case ir_unop_unpack_int_2x32:
+   case ir_unop_unpack_uint_2x32:
       /* This operation is not supported, or should have already been handled.
        */
       assert(!"Invalid ir opcode in glsl_to_tgsi_visitor::visit()");
-- 
2.11.0



More information about the mesa-dev mailing list