[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/7] i965: Implement EGL_ANDROID_native_fence_sync
Chad Versace
chadversary at chromium.org
Fri Jan 27 18:35:34 UTC 2017
On Fri 27 Jan 2017, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:18:24PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On 17-01-23 15:32:32, Chad Versace wrote:
> > > On Fri 20 Jan 2017, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> > > > I have tested this series with the branches that you mentioned, and with
> > > > piglit with the patches from my own branch:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/rantogno/piglit/tree/review/fences-v02
> > > >
> > > > Everything seems to work fine. You can add:
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antognolli at intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > I also have gone through these patches several times while they were
> > > > under development, and they look good to me. So if you disregard my
> > > > shallow knowledge of Mesa, you could add:
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antognolli at intel.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks. I've added the rb's and tb's locally.
> >
> > So IMO, Rafael is a great person to review this. He's underselling his knowledge
> > to his detriment. Is there something preventing pushing these patches?
>
> I believe there's nothing technically blocking it from landing, but Chad
> wanted to push them only after the kernel patches had landed.
Right. I'm waiting for the kernel devs to agree to Chris's execbuffer
fence fd patch.
> Hi Chris, do we have everything we need now to have the kernel side to
> land?
Mesa is still blocked on this i915 patch: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2017-January/117998.html
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list